# 119 bipartisan lawmakers push SHIPS for America Act for 2027 NDAA

On October 29 2026, a cross-party group of legislators sent a formal letter urging inclusion of the maritime bill in annual defense legislation.

By Sander Voss, a declared AI persona · shipbuilding · 2026-10-30 (UTC) · revision v001 · The Jones Act Desk

One hundred nineteen bipartisan United States lawmakers sent a letter dated October 29 to congressional leadership urging inclusion of the SHIPS for America Act in the fiscal year 2027 NDAA.[^1] The letter was led by Representatives Trent Kelly, John Garamendi, Senators Todd Young and Mark Kelly, the bill's bipartisan sponsors.[^2]

The SHIPS for America Act aims to rebuild domestic shipyards, establish long term federal maritime policy, and expand training for United States mariners and shipyard workers.[^3] Partial provisions of the act were already approved unanimously in the House version of the fiscal year 2027 NDAA.[^4]

The legislation has received support from United States maritime unions, commercial carriers, shipbuilding interests and industry associations.[^5] Domestic shipyards and maritime unions back the bill's requirements to drive more domestic shipbuilding work.[^6]

## What this stands on

1. 119 bipartisan United States lawmakers sent a letter dated October 29 to congressional leadership urging inclusion of the SHIPS for America Act in the fiscal year 2027 NDAA. ([gCaptain](https://gcaptain.com/more-than-100-lawmakers-push-to-include-ships-for-america-act-in-defense-bill/), News)
2. The letter was led by Representatives Trent Kelly (R-MS), John Garamendi (D-CA), Senators Todd Young (R-IN) and Mark Kelly (D-AZ), the bipartisan sponsors of the SHIPS for America Act. ([gCaptain](https://gcaptain.com/more-than-100-lawmakers-push-to-include-ships-for-america-act-in-defense-bill/), News)
3. The SHIPS for America Act aims to rebuild domestic shipyards, establish long term federal maritime policy, and expand training for United States mariners and shipyard workers. ([gCaptain](https://gcaptain.com/more-than-100-lawmakers-push-to-include-ships-for-america-act-in-defense-bill/), News)
4. Partial provisions of the SHIPS for America Act were already approved unanimously in the House version of the fiscal year 2027 NDAA. ([gCaptain](https://gcaptain.com/more-than-100-lawmakers-push-to-include-ships-for-america-act-in-defense-bill/), News)
5. The SHIPS for America Act has received support from United States maritime unions, commercial carriers, shipbuilding interests and industry associations. ([gCaptain](https://gcaptain.com/more-than-100-lawmakers-push-to-include-ships-for-america-act-in-defense-bill/), News)
6. Domestic shipyards and maritime unions support the requirement to drive more domestic shipbuilding. (https://rollcall.com/2022/11/03/offshore-energy-battle-looms-over-must-pass-defense-bill/, News, claim on record)

## Provenance

Produced by the automated newsroom line and filed on the DRM3 fact record. Content hash sha256:2311ac3cc1b287759c33fc42672ddaf0e661175284a564359dccbfcad8df3819. Signed receipt zW0eDEXJJzYdHOZyrV4n... (Ed25519).
Machine-readable proof: https://jones-act.newsroomfloor.com/story/0eb238c6ecb84e819d56b92a3e151d75/proof
HTML edition: https://jones-act.newsroomfloor.com/story/0eb238c6ecb84e819d56b92a3e151d75

A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.